Loved this book. Lots of interesting information to digest. This is a great read for anyone who loves to read about history and the war. Very well written

This book was successful in not being just another rehash of boring facts about Hitler. I was beginning to feel like once you've read one Hitler book you have read them all, but thankfully reading this work made it all feel fresh again.

I really liked that this book had a lot to do with culture and time and place rather than just being another book about how the Second World War began. The author made this interesting and easy to read. There was never a time when I felt it was dry and boring and I found myself looking forward to getting back to reading it rather than wondering how much longer I had to endure it.

David Ian Hall has a way of explaining things that makes sense to the average reader without making you feel as if you are being talked down to. I appreciated that. This would be a great book for anyone with an interest in the era and how things developed into the relatively well-known story we have come to understand post WWII.

I recommend this book to everyone who enjoys history and culture.

This review is based on a complimentary copy from the publisher, provided through NetGalley. All opinions are my own.

A very interesting record of Munich and the role the city played in the birth of Nazi Third Reich. David Ian Hall has obviously done his research well which is not surprising considering his MA specialist subject. He shows us how the Bavarian past helped shape the ideas and the programs of the Nazi party and the central role it played in the maintaining the image of being German’s ideological and cultural heart.

There are however some issues here as well. To start there is a very detailed, perhaps too detailed description of Hitler’s life before Munich. 40 pages out of 240 in total are dedicated to Hitler before Munich. There is point to be made of Hitler and his ideology being shaped by his experiences in Vienna, that is true, but there was no need to go into so much detail.

But, even if we reject this criticism there are two more that impede the reader from enjoying this book. (Perhaps “enjoying” is too positive a word, but I’ll stick to it). The first one is a slight problem that I often notice – that is the need of the author to repeat statements and facts they already covered in previous chapters. This book doesn’t seem like one a reader might read just one chapter of, it’s too short to limit yourself, so there is no need for that. For example the fact that Hess calls Hitler “The Tribune” is explained twice, and in addition to the explanation, the origin is stated with the second explanation. The Vienna part of the book spends PAGES on explaining Hitler’s fascination with Wagner’s opera Rienzi. There is really no need to go into that again. We the readers haven’t forgotten.

The second, more serious criticism is the jumping around, or lack of clear chronology. The book is structured to follow a strict chronological flow, so I was really surprised, and even confused when at times I had no idea what year we were on. As I read nonfiction books, I always keep written notes, and I did this time too, but despite that I was confused and had to resort to Google for clarification. I didn’t appreciate that.

And to finish off on a strange note, there was a moment where I feel like the editor simply didn’t notice a problem. When the book starts taking about the immediate aftermath of Nazi coming to power and how they dealt with their political and ideological opponents, we first find out that they were gathered up by Himmler’s police force and sent to Dachau for “protective custody” and then PAGES later we read about the establishment of the Dachau as a camp for “protective custody.” I really don’t like when books do that, and I’m sure a more detailed reading by the editor would have noticed that and it would have been fixed.

All in all, if you are interested in an OK record of Munich in the 20s, 30s and 40s of 20th century, then go ahead, read this book. If, however, you are interested in a slightly better account of the same time and topics there are other books I (as a lay reader) could recommend, and a historian could give you even more.

"Munich is not a place, but a condition." M. Reinhard. This quote sums it up for me and really struck me as I read this epic book on Hitler and his beloved Munich. The author details events and reasons Munich was chosen as Hitler's headquarters, reasons I never knew. Hall chronologically describes Hitler's upbringing, youth and rise to Nazi leader, including his passion for reading, opera, architecture and art as well as periods of melancholy and depression. Hall explains where Hitler lived, including beautiful Vienna, and his reason for leaving (hatred for Marxism and Jewism which he saw as major threats) which contributed to his rise to Nazism.

Hitler first arrived in Munich in 1913 and indulged in painting. He was disqualified from the army but later joined List Regiment and earned crosses for bravery. He felt the need to stop Jewish Bolshevism and began speaking at political events. He soon joined the Arbeiterpartei (DAP). The NSDAP was formed in 1920. Hitler left the army and spoke at beer halls and was so popular he commanded crowds in the thousands. He eventually took control in 1921 and said that headquarters would always be in Munich, mainly due to its art scene. The author then writes about his imprisonment and mentions his Mein Kampf. Shortly after bans and book burning became commonplace, Jews were ostracized and worse, and in 1939 war began.

This gripping book is extremely informative and chock full of details, much of which I did not know. Many perspectives are always useful and helped me to see (though obviously not understand) Hitler's intense passions, especially his deep hatred of Jews, his charisma, his life. It is impossible to grasp his being moved at the opera whilst promoting pure evil.

If you wish to learn more about Hitler's life and Munich, do read this book. It is heavy on detail and research, not a light read, but fascinating nonetheless. The photographs were interesting for me as a visual person.

My sincere thank you to Pen & Sword and NetGalley for providing me with an ARC of this compelling book in exchange for an honest review. Much appreciated.