Member Reviews

The Colony of Good Hope is a story based on fact: the attempt by Denmark, in the 1720s, to establish a colony in Greenland and to make Christians of the indigenous people.
I chose this book as I enjoy reading fiction that gives an insight into other countries and their histories and cultures and provides you with different perspectives on the world. In this case, I knew very little about Danish history and nothing at all about that of Greenland. Reading "The Colony of Good Hope " has decreased my ignorance a little: however the author warns, in his afterword, that “this book is a fiction … it runs closer to actual historical events than its predecessor but it should not be read as a reliable historical account”.
The words “its predecessor” give away the fact that this is the second book in a trilogy: I wasn’t aware of this until reaching the end of the book and it stands alone perfectly well.
Leine marshals a large cast of characters, most of whom (again, quoting from the afterword) “were real people and appear under their own names. While I have made use of their biographies … I have taken considerable liberties with them”.
These characters range from the king of Denmark, through the group of convicts and sex workers who are conscripted to provide the labour force and form the backbone of the colony, to the indigenous Greenlanders. The narrative is divided between an omniscient narrator and a variety of these characters, including a ship’s captain; a surgeon; the governor’s mentally-ill housekeeper (whose stream-of-consciousness ramblings make her the most challenging of the narrators to read); Appaluttoq the shaman and Katerina, a Greenlander who has become a devout Christian. While it can take time to get into each new narrator, this technique allows you to get inside the characters and to see the various personages from different perspectives.
The title refers to the name of the colony “Godthåb”: however, the original Danish title translates as “Red Man, Black Man”. The “red man” is Appaluttoq, whose words open the novel; the “black man” is the Lutheran minister, Hans Egede. The two are locked in a continual struggle, and not just for the souls of the Greenlanders. However, although the English title is very different and comparatively literal it is not a bad one. Hope is endemic among the settlers – hope of wealth, power, success, attaining salvation (and bringing the so-called “heathens” to salvation) or just hope of survival; even the futile hope of the alchemist.
Egede is at the centre of the book, as he is at the centre of the colony. A severe and unbending clergyman, a devout and uncompromising Lutheran, hot-tempered, feared by his family and mostly unsuccessful in his efforts to convert the Greenlanders to Christianity – something he is himself so aware of that he is reluctant to baptise any of them, knowing that they are not truly convinced by his preaching. Egede is seen through the eyes of the various narrators and is presented as a complex character, and one for whom we can even feel sympathy, rather than merely a stereotyped man of religion.
The book requires a strong stomach in places: there are visceral accounts of a post-mortem, childbirth, a mastectomy and the effects of a smallpox epidemic as well as a character with Ozzy Ozbourne tendencies. The descriptions of the colony and the Greenlanders’ dwellings use smell as much as they do sight.
Translator Martin Aitken skilfully conveys the various voices and a sense of the language and idiom of the 1700s.
“The Colony of Good Hope” is a slow burn, not conventionally dramatic and potentially dramatic incidents are often downplayed. Even so, it draws the reader in and while it is not always an easy read it is certainly a rewarding one.

Was this review helpful?

This was a historical fiction book that i liked in some ways and found hard in others. I thought the story was interesting and I liked the setting and the era that it was set in. I thought it was well written with a good narrative, well developed characters, some of who I liked and others that I struggled with.
the pace was a bit slow and so was the tension, but then I think it had to be for the story to work. Some areas I liked and others just fell a bit flat unfortunately, but it was still an ecjoyable read so for me it was a 3 star read.

Was this review helpful?

I’m in a bit of a quandary about how to review this book - parts of it were really wonderful and parts left me struggling to continue to the end. The basic premise is the clash between Christianity and the pagan religions practised by the native Greenlanders in the 18th century. The story is centred on the Danish missionary Hans Egede and his nemesis Appaluttoq, a shaman of the local religion. The Danish King wishes to establish a colony in Greenland, and sends an assortment of criminals, priests and others to do so, but without the tools and supplies needed to keep everyone alive in a hostile environment. Most of what follows is inevitable, and much of the book describes the tragic outcome of this misguided attempt to harness Greenland’s natural wealth and to convert its native population. The characters in the book, both Christian and native are well drawn, and the descriptions of the landscape are stunning, and obviously very well researched. There is not much joy in this book, but is deeply moving and very well written and translated. .

Was this review helpful?