A thoughtful and thought provoking collection of essays that I enjoyed very much. Intimate writing full of personal reflection and yet the book is very accessible. It's made me consider more deeply why I like and am attracted to certain artworks more than others.

Recommended, my thanks to Netgalley and Fitzcarraldo for the opportunity to read Affinities.

Affinities by Brian Dillon is a thoughtful collection of essays detailing reflections on different pieces of art.

Elegantly written essays. Brian Dillon is a talented writer and writes beautifully and succintly on artists. Affinities is an enjoyable read and masterly work.

This collection of essays was captivating and thought-provoking, moving between the broadest of topics with ease and poise.

I am intrigued by how Brian Dillon is able to create narrative threads in this collection- seemingly unconnected facts and ideas are peppered throughout, until they slowly come back later to surprise and enthrall you.

I received an advanced copy of this book from NetGalley and the publisher in exchange for an honest review.

Affinities is a wondrous collection of short, intimate essays by Brian Dillon exploring his fascination with the visual arts, completing his trilogy on Essays, Sentences, and Images. In Affinities, Brian Dillon analyses a selection of images, finding tangible connections between the image he sees and the image that reflects back in his mind, offering meticulous analysis that moves between sentiment and circumstance.

Continuing a theme found in his previous books, "Essayism" and "Suppose a Sentence," Dillon evanesces on the idea of "affinity" through his impassioned interpretations of images and photographs, from historical artworks to film stills to obscure scientific illustrations, and ruminates on the abstract pleasure of experiencing art. He adorns his interrogation with personal passages, conjuring up memories of empty streets in lockdown, migraine auras in childhood, and even a postcard he found and used as a bookmark, cataloging his own affinity with the images and ultimately finding an affinity between literary criticism and memoir.

In one essay, Dillon dissects the photography of Virginia Woolf's eccentric great aunt, Julia Margaret Cameron, focusing on the composition and lighting of a portrait of Woolf's mother that bears a striking resemblance to images of Woolf herself, before reflecting on Cameron's more famous subjects—Charles Darwin and Alfred Tennyson—and examining the medium and process she used with astute attention to detail.

In Four Stars, he considers Andy Warhol's "Outer and Inner Space," his "sometimes favourite" work of art, and examines the morbid portrayal of Edie Sedgwick's identity, both "the superstar's appearance and her interiority," leaving the lingering question: which of the four images represent her internal and external selves? A similar distinction can be made in Taylor Swift's album, "reputation," an affinity I've drawn up myself, in which she divulges the pitfalls of fame through a satirisation of her public image. Swift performs as the character forged for her by the public, a cold and calculated, vengeful ex-girlfriend, embodying the persona stamped all over the media. She wears her reputation like armour in the lines "I bury hatchets, but I keep maps of where I put them," and "I’ve got a list of names, and yours is in red, underlined," but her insecurities permeate in the final desperate plea, "Please don't ever become a stranger whose laugh I could recognize anywhere." Swift seized the narrative with "reputation," refused to provide an explanation, and in the process, fused her interior and exterior selves into one.

Throughout Affinities, Dillon indulges his own enthusiasm for finding affinities, weaving through a myriad of subjects, a patchwork of art forms and mediums, confessing it's a "habit of the critic and essayist and one [he] cannot give up." At one point, he questions the intention behind his essays, criticizing his lack of an argument or proposal, but his thematic response is more than sufficient. He writes to feed his craving for the "dream state"—the pleasure of being immersed in art and the thrill of chasing a tangent through a tunnel down to its end—over and over. Dillon presents his thoughts with elegance and intensity, providing context with references to readings and his inspiration throughout, all while maintaining accessibility for those unfamiliar with the source texts and images.

There is a nostalgic quality to the precision with which Dillon recalls the exact moment he first encountered an image or photograph. The evocative images in his mind become just as important as those being dissected on the page, elevating his essays to a meditation on memory and human sentiment as much as they are on affinities. The images he observes are not chosen for any historical significance, but for the way they cannot escape his inquiry; they seek his focus as much as he seeks theirs. Dillon's appreciation for looking and reading is resonant; there is a distinct power in his gaze and an undeniable intelligence to his unique stream of consciousness.

Combining curiosity with scholarly interpretation, Affinities is an analytical and intimate response to literature and art, ideal for readers of Susan Sontag and Maggie Nelson.

Award-winning writer, curator and critic, Brian Dillon’s Affinities stands alone but also works brilliantly as a companion piece to earlier books like Suppose a Sentence in that he’s continuing to write about things that he loves or is fascinated by. This time round, his focus is on images, a project that grew out of his experiences in the early months of pandemic lockdowns. Dillon effortlessly combines aspects of memoir, reflection and analysis, presenting an array of accessible, intelligent and contemplative, short essays or reflective pieces centred on individual images or artists. These are interspersed with a series of roving and roaming thoughts on the nature of affinity, what it means to be drawn to or experience the sensation of personal affinity with a photograph or perhaps a painting or even a still from a movie – some form of object or visual encounter that may be appealing, something that may provoke pleasure or stimulate ideas or simply, inexplicably, linger in the mind. His choices are wonderfully eclectic including discussions of Claude Cahun’s surrealist photos to Hannah Hoch’s Dadaist collages, Francesca Woodman’s mysterious reinventions of the self-portrait and Kikuji Kawada’s visions of Japan - although part of what made this so enjoyable for me is that a number of his chosen artworks overlapped with ones I’ve also felt connected to or been intrigued by. For readers unfamiliar with Dillon, if you enjoy or are interested in art and visual culture or if you’ve liked the kind of essays associated with writers like Maggie Nelson, Olivia Laing or Eula Biss then he’s well worth exploring

Affinities is a typically intriguing collection. Like Brian Dillon's previous books, I learned a lot from it, and was impressed by its range of reference and allusion. In short, I admired it but I didn't really enjoy it as such. Dillon quotes Susan Sontag at one point, where in her diaries she claimed to "write essays not to persuade but to produce an effect." There's something of this in Affinities too. Although he does refer to his experience, it's not a very personally revealing book, which also makes it seem slightly cold and humourless.. Photography is one of its main concerns and a comparison with Geoff Dyer's much more personal (even self-obsessed) books on the subject reveal its weaknesses. Read it for its breadth, rather than its depth.

Elegantly written and thoughtfully considered. I suspect I’ll be thinking on this one for quite some time to come.

What a smart and thoughtful writer Dillon is! This book would be especially good for readers (unlike me!) who are as at home with visual images as they are with texts as this collection of essays explores the affinities between media with nuance and an accessible complexity.

While this is not an academic book, it does draw on academic theory (think Barthes, Sontag and so on, writers who have theorised visuality) but isn't weighed down with either footnotes (there is a list of illustrations at the back) or with the burden of an argument. The writing is more free-flowing, making unexpected connections and I especially loved the range of images from seventeenth century engravings to late Victorian photographic portraits to modern images. Divided up into fairly short pieces, this is perfect for dipping into for some intellectual but not dull companionship on the commute.