Member Reviews

With thanks to the author, publishers Simon and Schuster UK, and NetGalley for providing me with an eARC of this book in exchange for my honest review.

A really enjoyable cold-case murder investigation.

The main protagonist Nicolette Sarto, a young junior reporter in the early stages of her career, is a strong female character that is well able to deal with the struggles she experiences in what is very much a male-dominated industry at the time. The plot deals with sensitive topics such as murder and abortion but in a way that keeps them central to the story without getting bogged down by them, while the dialog is crisp and snappy, and some of the exchanges between Nicolette and her colleagues at the newspaper were very witty and sarcastic, which of course we love in Ireland!

The main story is set in 1960s Dublin with the murder itself having taken place twenty years earlier, and I’m not sure if it was this jumping back and forth between timelines or the fact that I found the plot itself a little complex and convoluted, but I did find the story somewhat confusing to follow at times.

Overall I did very much enjoy the book though, and thought the author did a fine job of putting the reader in the atmospheric surroundings of a 1960s Dublin winter to follow the story.

Was this review helpful?

I’m not usually a fan of stories that flip about with times, but I had no problem with this one. I actually felt I was in Dublin, it was so well written. I found that I really didn’t want to put it down (so not a great one to read at bedtime if you’re a poor sleeper, as I am). The story kept me guessing until the end. I loved the strong women characters, striding for their independence. I’d highly recommend this book.

Was this review helpful?

I hate to rate so low but it’s one of the rare times I DNF (at around 65% so I did give it a good go). I just didn’t connect in anyway to any of the characters or the story. I felt myself skipping ahead and not interested in what happens. Unfortunately not for me but perhaps I’m not the intended audience

Was this review helpful?

I'm kicking myself for leaving this book unread on my NeyGalley shelf for so long as when I finally picked it up I loved it so much that I just didn't want to put it down. I just adored it! I loved following Nicoletta as she tries to make it as a journalist in 1960s Dublin, in a very male dominated arena. She is such an interesting woman and I was rooting for her to succeed all the way through. It follows her as she finds herself following the mystery of an actress who disappeared 20 years earlier and now a body has been discovered that is likely to be her. We then follow the investigation as it delves into quite a few women's issues. This is such a gripping and engaging read and it feels like a story that will stay with me for a long time to come. I highly recommend it!

Was this review helpful?

Thank you to Netgalley for affording me an opportunity to read an ARC of this book. The premise, that a body is discovered and a young female journalist goes off to research the story and how it might link to events of twenty years earlier was a good one. Overall I enjoyed the book, although there were some aspects of it that seemed unrealistic (notably the link between the protagonist and the famed Julia Bridges - on which no more can be said for fear of spoiling the book). It all tied up a bit neatly for me with the happy ending, and convenient ending to an inconvenient pregnancy.

Was this review helpful?

So many people loved this book, but I found it hard-going. The plot introduced names with no context, it was confusing having to re-read parts in case I'd missed something - but it's just the style of writing - things became clear sometimes much further on. Another reviewer mentioned 'Irish-Noir' as a genre and it was definitely this. Two bodies are uncovered in the grounds of a large house outside Dublin; one of which is an actress who vanished in 1943, the other is a baby.
Nicoletta Sarto is a young, ambitious journalist working for the Irish Sentinal who takes up the story, and is hoping to obtain a promotion. Her living and working life are extremely claustrophobic but it was nice to see largely supportive males in her work and other colleagues in 1968. Her personal story becomes deeply enmeshed with the case. I found it unrealistic that people were so willing to 'tell all' when she questioned them. I also found a solicitor giving up a letter to her with no proof of who she was, laughable. I found the writing very 'wordy' and opted to speed read parts. Nicoletta seemed to be constantly wet through and shivering with cold, wearing impractical clothes; or boiling with sweat running down her spine due to being indoors by a fire (why couldn't she just take her coat off?) Little annoyances seemed to grow and I didn't warm to her character at all. In face apart from the helpful Guarda (O'Connor) I didn't really like anyone. A very grey, dismal claustrophobic read. Others obviously enjoy this and I realise I'm in the minority!

Was this review helpful?

This is a really well written book, however the story just wasn't for me. The story was interesting however I found it a bit predictable, and slow. I would try another book by the author though as it was written well.

Was this review helpful?

Well written historical fiction. The characters are well developed and the setting really brings you in and immerses you.

Kept me hooked and didn’t go as i expected which is nice.

Was this review helpful?

A very accomplished novel for a debut from a new author. Set in Dublin a city I have visited a few times and in the year 1968 when I was 23 I can relate to both the setting and the time and was comfortable with the way the author portrayed them. When bones of an actress ,who was reported missing in the 1940’s ,are dug up close to Christmas 1968 Nicoletta Sarto a young reporter is tasked with researching the story behind
..the mystery. Being very ambitious and keen to secure promotion she investigates wholeheartedly. We are slowly given details of Nicoletta’s earlier life as the story unfolds and her current relationship.there are several strands in this well plotted book which the author merges together skilfully before an explosive ending. I hope this is the start of a series and I could easily see it being adapted for television.

Was this review helpful?

In 1960s, Dublin, an ambitious young journalist, is keen to uncover the story behind the newly found remains of a stage starlet, wo went missing a couple of decades before. Her bones have been found near those of a baby and seem to be linked to the case of a notorious midwife who was jailed for deaths connected to illicit abortions. Nicoletta is keen to prove her skills as a journalist, but her questions are raking up things many would prefer to forget. Getting people to talk is difficult. The answers bring her perilously close to her ow door, so she needs to be sure that she really wants to uncover the truth. #wheretheylie #clairecoughlan #netgalley #literarythriller

Was this review helpful?

Nicoletta Sarto, is, in 1968, among the few women journalists in Dublin. This is a Dublin my older relatives would recognise, a smaller city, in which transport options are few and social circles are restricted. WHERE THEY LIE is set between Christmas Eve and New Year’s Day. Nicoletta is a copy-taker and journalist, working the boring night shift at the Sentinel on Burgh Quay. This fictional newspaper resembles the papers of the day, in which court cases reported could see someone sent to hang for murder.
Continued.

Was this review helpful?

It is the 60s in Dublin, 1968 to be exact. Nicoletta Sarto is a junior reporter for the Irish Senitel, keen, ambitious, and wants to try and make it, in what is arguably a ‘man's world’. Nicoletta gets a break when the bones of Julia Bridges are discovered in a garden on the outskirts of Dublin. Working on the Christmas shift, Nicoletta picks up the 25-year-old case, and gets to investigating who Julie Bridges was and what happened when she first disappeared.

Julie was last seen entering the house of Gloria Fitzpatrick, who was later put on trial (and convicted) for the murder of another woman, whose abortion she facilitated. It was never proven that Gloria was involved in Julia’s death, and Julia’s body was never found - until now. Police seem to be keen to draw a line under Julia’s death, and chalk it up to Gloria. But Nicoletta is a good reporter, and being a woman has its advantages. She is good at her job, people open up to her, and she gets drawn into a story she never could have imagined.

While trying to fight for her place on the paper reporting team, she is delving deeper into the case, unearthing secrets people thought long buried, and that they want to keep buried. Some of the secrets she uncovers will change how she looks at her life forever. How she continues on this path will change how her life progresses. How far will she go for her job, a career, and everything she thinks she wants in life?

This book is beautifully written, really immersing you in the Dublin of the past. If you have any familiarity with Dublin you will see the places before your eyes are they are being described, but transported back into the 60’s, how they used to be. The descriptive writing is fantastic. The characters created in this story are also very real, raw and full of emotion.

Nicoletta’s struggle to make it in a man’s world, where women were still expected to be at home with the kids, and ambition is seen as a dirty thing in a woman is painful to see, we can emphasise with her experience and want to reassure her that things will get better. Her pain, anguish and loneliness jump off the page, create an atmosphere of struggle and despair, and underscore the importance that solving this case has to Nicoletta. Watching her relationships with her lover, her parents and her colleagues unfold is wonderful, as she navigates growing into herself and her confidence to be unapologetically the woman she wants to be, in a time that does not yet recognise or reward this.

I didn’t know what to expect when I started this book, it not being something typical I would pick up. Something drew me to it, and I am so glad I read it. The story was painful but beautiful, original, with fantastic pacing and the twists excellently crafted. Absolutely recommend this as a read, and I look forward to more from this author!

*I received this book from NetGalley for review, but all opinions are my own.

Was this review helpful?

I struggled with this book initially but once I had read a third of it I was absorbed. Told in two timelines - 1943 death of Julia Bridges and 1968 when her bones are found. The story is investigated by novice journalist, Nicoletta Sarto. As she investigates she wants to understand more about the police’s certainty that Gloria Fitzpatrick is to blame for her death. She becomes embroiled in the workings of the illegal abortion industry and finds out secrets from her own past.

Nicoleta is trying to make a name for herself in the male dominated newspaper industry in Ireland and is dealing with a number of personal issues at the same time.

This novel deals with a number of difficult issues but in a proportionate manner. You empathise with Nicoletta as she grapples with her past story and her determination to do justice to Gloria.

An interesting debut - I will be interested to read more from this author.

Was this review helpful?

Where They Lie is a solid debut which surprises you and makes you think. Claire Coughlan is an author that makes you think and her work is exciting and new and I cannot wait to read more from her.

Was this review helpful?

1960s Dublin. Very atmospheric. Not sure about the main character Nicoletta whether I liked her or not but a very different time. A bit slow going for me personally. Intriguing story. Would give the author another try. Can imagine it being a sort of "Shetland Mark 2"

Was this review helpful?

3.5⭐️⭐️⭐️


✨Slow paced. Thriller . Sets in two scenarios . Abortion ⚠️

✨Julia is missing. It was a big scandal as she was an actress. The last sighting of her is entering a house which Gloria owns.
Up until they went to Dublin, a reporter was eager on what happen to the Irish actress .

✨this story has a lot of twist but yet again it’s predictable. Has a tiny bit of romance but not as visible.

✨overall , it’s a good read for a debut.

✨Claire, Thankyou and it was a pleasure and would love to read more .

✨Thankyou #netgalley for the opportunity to read this arc for a honest review.


❤️shaye.reads

Was this review helpful?

An atmospheric mystery set in 1960s Dublin. The evocative period detail is well written and researched.

Was this review helpful?

“Dublin’s a small place. No one is let have secrets” and wow how Nicoletta certainly learns this lesson.
It's Christmas time in 1960s Dublin and Nicoletta is working as a reporter in the Sentinel. When a body is found in a garden she has no idea just how close to home it is and how over the course of a few days her life will change utterly.
An excellent unusual plot that slowly unravels itself in the most unexpected way.

Was this review helpful?

It's Christmas Eve, 1968 in Dublin, and Nicoletta Sarto has been calling local police stations to see if there is any news, anywhere at all, when she receives a call to say that human remains have been found, suspected to be those of a woman who went missing 25 years ago.

As Nicoletta starts to investigate the story, she quickly gets entangled in a way that she wasn't expecting.

This is a really atmospheric book, and although it kind of seems like a simple thriller/mystery at first, it's actually closer to literary fiction. The story addresses the lack of choice women had not all that long ago when it came to their bodily autonomy and involves some pretty heavy subjects.

I did enjoy this, but I do think maybe it turned out to be a little convoluted. There were quite a lot of characters and occassionally I struggled to keep track of them all. The writing's atmospheric and I think has a lot of potential, so I'll definitely be reading Claire Coughlan's next book.

Was this review helpful?

In Dublin, 1939, Gloria Fitzpatrick lost her midwifery licence; in 1943 Julia Bridges disappeared and Gloria was suspected; in 1968 Julia’s body was found in a suburban garden, but Gloria had died in 1956. Nicoletta Sarto (27), a trainee journalist is given the task of reporting on the new discovery and the old cases for her paper. A promotion is dangled if she does well, so she sets off with vigour. However, while following the clues and interviewing the relevant people, Garda officers, family members, friends, workmates, she stumbles on a tortuous interaction of miscarriages, abortions, forging of birth registers, theatrical links, philandering, and probable manipulation or ignoring of evidence by a Garda officer. And it all starts to get a bit personal.
The structure of the story is fairly standard, essentially a maverick investigator in a police procedural except that the main investigator is a journalist. I have given a short and broad precis because Nicoletta’s history is so intertwined that further details would be spoilers. Ireland’s history with regard to what we would now describe as “Women’s Rights” is pertinent but not overplayed, although I feel that the author wanted to make a point of it. As far as the procedural element is concerned, this is a good example. However, there are places where the plot is a bit loose, as if the author intended a different story but became trapped in this one. The Barney sub-plot, for example, doesn’t seem to have much rationale. There are some twists in the plot but nothing very surprising comes of them. However, it’s quite an enjoyable read overall and many readers will love it.
I would like to thank NetGalley, the publishers and the author for providing me with a draft proof copy for the purpose of this review.

Was this review helpful?