Member Reviews

I enjoyed the story and the Oxford atmosphere but found the careful use of language got in the way. Although I did learn a lot in an entertaining way. I got to like Martha, Alex and Zoe and would like to meet them again. I hope Martha's relationship with Caldwell develops. A sympathetic approach to a police investigation was a welcome change from many books. #netgalley #guiltybydefinition

Was this review helpful?

I was excited by the premise of this book, especially as Susie Dent is known for her expertise with words but unfortunately I felt like the use of fancy words every single chance the characters get was just too much and felt like Susie was simply showing off how much she knows to fit it into a book.

I enjoyed the overall plot and was intrigued with the disappearance and wanted to find out what happened and I also liked the main characters; Martha, Zoe and Alex but I did find myself skim reading some paragraphs involving word definitions that I just didn't care about at all.

I also liked the inclusion of the letters which were riddles that had to be solved as they helped to make clever steps in the investigation and the majority of the book was very enjoyable. I liked the development and progression of the story with help from the clues and I was excited to reach the end to find out the truth of what really happened.

Overall, I enjoyed the plot and the characters but felt that there was too much showing off from the author involving words that made some parts of the book quite boring.

Was this review helpful?

This was a little slow to start with and I found it hard to get into but as I became involved with the story and the characters it gathered pace and I enjoyed it. Susie Dent's mystery is set in a setting she knows about and her use of language is interesting. They always say write what you know about - and she certainly did.
The clues were interesting and it was possible for the reader to solve some.
Well written and interesting.
Three and a half stars for me.
Many thanks to Netgalley/Susie Dent/Bonnier Books UK for a digital copy of this title. All opinions expressed are my own.

Was this review helpful?

A very complex book with good descriptive background but I thought that the characters lacked depth and found it confusing at times. I am an avid reader but I found that the vocabulary was too obscure and slowed the flow of the novel

Was this review helpful?

Thank you to Netgalley for an advanced copy of this book in exchange for an honest review.

I love Susie Dent, but in all honesty I found this book a little slow and muddled in places. Sorry.

Was this review helpful?

This is a very enjoyable mystery with lots of cryptic clues as you would expect from this author. The mystery unfolds when Martha , Alex and Zoe receive clues about, Martha’s sister’s disappearance that happened years ago. . Martha is senior editor at the Clarendon English Dictionary in Oxford and this is where the investigation begins. What follows is a complex mystery where clues need to be solved. The novel is full of obscure words and definitions which I found a fun element . The characters are well drawn and we get to know them individually and the part they play. What was Charlie , Martha’s sister involved in before she goes missing , what happened to her all those years ago. We gradually find out with a satisfying ending . A fun mystery full of intrigue and of course unusual words .

Was this review helpful?

Guilty by definition-Susie Dent

I have always admired Susie Dent. She is obviously a very clever cookie, so to have the opportunity to read her debut novel was exciting. However, not more than a few % of pages in, I was bored and frustrated. Not long after that, I gave up-never something I do easily with any author’s work. A fictional novel about a dictionary, a book about words and their importance and meanings. I may have missed out by not carrying on-my loss, but this was not for me, or reluctantly I assume, Jimmy Carr.

Was this review helpful?

📚 review 📚
guilty by definition - susie dent

i feel like susie dent wrote this with me in mind - chapter headers made up of interesting words, a murder mystery being solved by people who work at a dictionary and cryptic clues that could have come out of a cross word puzzle.

the setting of oxford feels kind of perfect for a novel about people who work at a dictionary and i am a big fan of nerds solving crime.

i think some of the clues and references might be a bit on the subtle side - as a casual shakespeare reader, some was lost in me but this didn’t hamper my enjoyment. i’ll also say that our main character martha is not in any way likable, which i think might hamper some people’s enjoyment. i mean, i kinda related - i too care more about fun words than i do people. (thanks autism), but some of the things she said and did did make me cringe a little. zoe is clearly the best character, though the inclusion of cats with nerdy literature names was also a big tick for me. the cryptic clues and famous locations across oxford to solve the mystery of what happened to charlie was good fun and reminded me of the old episodes of morse i used to watch. the mystery itself was pretty decent though i had an inkling as to the perpetrator by the half way mark and the identity of the letter writer felt a little contrived but over all a good solid murder mystery

ngl i am loving this trend of tv personalities writing murder mysteries.

thank you @netgalley for the early copy
.

Was this review helpful?

I really, really wanted to like this book, but sadly I didn't.

Martha's sister Charlie disappeared 10 years ago, she was in the throes of finishing her PhD and also worked part time at the CED.

Martha is back from Berlin and is now working at the same place, and living with her remaining parent, her father. Life is quiet until anonymous letters are sent to the office, which Martha and her colleagues try to decipher, when they do all clues point to Charlie having found an important commonplace book.

The book tried very hard but I found it to be quite pretentious with words that were randomly put in at the start of each chapter which didn't seem to fit with the story thread, and then were littered throughout the book, often going off on a tangent and the story having to be dragged back (kicking and screaming!)

The actual story is just a basic one of girl disappears and anonymous letters, not much substance, no really likeable characters, lots of long words which the person on the street wouldn't know or be able to say..

I am sure some people will appreciate the book, unfortunately I wasn't one of them.

Was this review helpful?

This is a well-written and engaging tale about Martha - a lexicographer - based at a fictional dictionary in Oxford. Years before, Martha's sister, Charlie, went missing, never to be found. When cryptic messages start arriving at the offices, and with other people, it is up to Martha, her colleagues Alex, Zoe and Simon to get to the bottom of what is going on.

Dent is a skilled writer - clearly, words are significant in her life, and this is, to an extent, somewhat autobiographical in terms of Martha's life and education. At times, it is creepy, and at other times, sad. Overall, though, it is a very good depiction of what happens when the past is dug up - and the lengths people will go to in order to find out the truth.

I do hope that Susie Dent writes more fiction. Thank you to the publisher and NetGalley for the ARC.

Was this review helpful?

Amost unusual story centred on an editor and her team of researchers searching for lost words and their meaning in ancient times in the evolution of the English language. They are challenged by a cryptic letter from a mystic person signed as Chorus with a reference to an unsolved murder. But nothing is what it seems, under multiple layers of hidden meanings it seems to refer to a missing person, the older sister of the editor, a cold case of a decade ago. There after follows a series of similar letters with clues hidden to be found. Who is Chorus, is Charlie alive so where is she, or if dead how did she die?

Was this review helpful?

Working for a dictionary is somehow dangerous.

It’s an unusual place for a murder mystery to be set, though greed is the motive. The majority of the story is groundwork, leading up to solving a decade old mystery, a couple of twists, some relief and self forgiveness, and a new start of sorts for two characters. There’s a reasonably satisfying humiliation and decline of an entitled prig and more justice meted out on another conspirator that’s well deserved. All the action and explanation happens in the last ten percent of the book. You are made to work a bit to follow some of the text, stuffed as it is, with words most mere mortals would never employ in their day to day conversations. You don’t work out who the villains are until you’re told, or who the mysterious instigator of the revelations is, or their convoluted reasons for waiting so long. It only becomes clear at the end!

Was this review helpful?

I had great hopes for this book and I was more than a little disappointed to say the least. I know Susie is a lexicographer but it’s just far too wordy. It got in the way of what was an ok storyline. And towards the denouement and just a couple of pages left to read the main ‘culprit’ hadn’t been named and I was beginning to wonder if I’d missed it. Luckily all was resolved but that seemed a bit rushed.

Was this review helpful?

This is a book to be read during the autumn/winter, when you can sit in a comfy chair with a hot drink and have the time to admire all the beautifully crafted definitions, descriptions, language and the languid pacing of the story. I wish this was when I read it as I'm sure I would have appreciated all of the above a lot more. Perhaps a re-read will be in order later in the year.

Was this review helpful?

A cleverly written story .
As you would expect from Susie Dent the book is peppered with lovely long words .
At times I felt the book was slow going and the words seem to take centre stage above the characters and the story .
The mystery was a solid one and worth persevering to the end .
Just a little slow for my taste but a good read nevertheless.
Thanks to NetGalley and Bonnier Books UK .

Was this review helpful?

Guilty By Definition - Suzie Dent

As you might imagine, Suzie has put some obscure words into her first fiction book...but here's the good thing; she's given definitions along with them.

Undoubtedly she could have filled the book with words only someone with the IQ of a planet could've read without a trusty dictionary to hand, but she didn't.

Every chapter begins with a (random to the plot) word, its definition and origin. Within the text, some more oddities, but all helpfully described.

Overall, I'd describe this as a 'cosy' thriller. There's nothing even approaching bloodthirsty or sordid, but it is very readable. Well structured with the odd twist...it's not award winning (although who knows, with Suzie's notoriety?) but it just flows.

The Plot

No spoilers, but the sleeve notes describe a mystery note that arrives at the offices of the Clarendon English Dictionary in Oxford. The letter is obscure, almost a clue/challenge to be solved....and the first letter points to the year 2010....the year Senior Editor Martha Thornhill's sister went missing. Then follows a cat and mouse game of further letters/postcards with ever more vague puzzles to be solved, and a team of lexicographers trying to unravel the mystery...and who is the mysterious 'Chorus' penning them...

My criticisms would be there appears to be a lack of character building throughout....I never felt affiliated or sympathetic/antagonised by anyone in the book. Here it's all about the plot...but it still read well.
Also, the clues littered throughout aren't anything a reader could fathom, and the way they were solved by the characters seemed opportune, to say the least!

Many reference Shakespeare's words and works...it's not off-putting, and is a central theme here.

All in all, a good read I think and I devoured it in a couple of days.

Was this review helpful?

A cleverly plotted murder mystery which revolves around Dent’s specialities – etymology and lexicography. The main characters work in Oxford at the Clarendon English Dictionary which gives Dent the freedom to indulge her passion of educating her readers on rare and interesting words and their provenance, sometimes to a distracting level of frequency. Despite this, the writing is excellent, and the overall story is great. I hope Dent continues crime writing as this is definitely promising for the future.
My thanks to the author, publisher and NetGalley. This review was written voluntarily and is entirely my own unbiased opinion.

Was this review helpful?

I enjoyed this mystery. Although stumped by a number of Chorus's references in their letters, I enjoyed watching how Dent's characters solved the clues. I particularly appreciated the female colleagues, and how they became a support network to Martha and each other. As an Abingdonian I also liked the Oxford setting and felt Dent captured more than just the student and tourist sides of the City.

Was this review helpful?

Martha returns to Oxford to work as a lexicographer at the Clarendon English Dictionary. Following the disappearance of her sister Charlie over ten years ago, Martha left Oxford and has lived in Berlin.
An original start to each chapter with a new word heading, its meaning and its origins.
Mysterious letters begin to arrive at the CED, signed 'Chorus' with clues relating to Charlie's disappearance. Martha and her colleagues ( I especially warmed to Zoe) set on a trail to decipher the clues.
Many twists and turns, with Oxford playing an important role in the novel and the descriptions of the city all adding to the intrigue.
A great read with great characters.
I loved the way the mystery unfolds. Did I guess the outcome? Yes, eventually.
Thanks to NetGalley and the publishers for the ARC.

Was this review helpful?

I enjoy murder mysteries, I like Susie Dent and I love finding out about the origins of words and phrases, so this should have been a 5 star book for me. Unfortunately it's more of a 3.5. It's not that it's a bad book, it's just that I felt the story and characters often seemed to be less important than cryptic clues and obscure words which take you away from the flow of the novel to find out their meaning. While there's an OK murder mystery here, it sometimes feels as if the story is being suffocated by the heavy vocabulary.
Set in Oxford, this is a literary mystery surrounding the 10 year old disappearance of young woman, with a series of anonymous letters providing cryptic clues to the staff at CED, Clarendon English Dictionary. The team need to pool their various specialist skills to decode each letter and then set about solving the mystery.
I love a good mystery and whodunnit but I found the story too slow paced and the characters hard to engage with. I did however learn a lot of fascinating new words and that was enjoyable.
With thanks to NetGalley and the publishers for an ARC.

Was this review helpful?