Member Reviews

This is a really beautiful book. It came to my attention due to its Booker longlisting, I was delighted to get the opportunity to read this ahead of its publication date.

Held is a book about love, loss, change and connections. The prose is exquisite thoughout as the book unfolds in its unusual fragmentary style.

Initially ( the first 40 pages or so) I found this book quite challenging so I gave up on trying to work out where the book was going and just gave in to the beautiful writing. I didn’t alway understand parts of this book and it’s absolutely a book that deserves and requires a reread, I think the connections will sharpen for me in doing so. Yet despite this it was a really pleasant reading experience, almost dreamlike in parts.

One of the most unusual books I’ve read this year.

Was this review helpful?

Held
By Anne Michaels

I can acknowledge that this Booker longlist nominated translation is poetic and dreamy but I find it difficult to interpret and rather unmoored. I'm not a huge fan of this style of writing and just did not enjoy my reading of this. It's getting a lot of really good reviews so it is likely just a matter of taste.

Thanks to #netgalley and the publisher for access to a review copy in exchange for my honest opinion.

Was this review helpful?

This book tells of love stories and deaths that span generations, it's full of connections that I feel I've not fully worked out. The prose is poetic and some of it is easily read and understood, whilst other parts requires much more brain power! I think it's a book that needs to be read a few times to get the most out of it, and some parts of it absolutely absorbed me, whilst I felt a little lost in others.

Was this review helpful?

I really tried to like this book as the writing is undoubtedly beautiful but I found it so hard to connect with the characters and their situations, it all felt jarring and disconnected. I really appreciated the opportunity to read it though and thank the publisher for providing me with an ARC to review.

Was this review helpful?

A stunning book which has remained with me long after I turned the final page. Humanity laid bare in beautiful prose. A must read.

Was this review helpful?

Longlisted for the Booker Prize 2024, Anne Michaels’ "Held" weaves interconnected narratives spanning from World War I to the modern era, exploring themes of memory, grief, and love amidst historical brutality.
The narrative shifts across time and geography—from England to the Gulf of Finland—yet feels disjointed, reliant on clichés and predictable metaphors. Characters' struggles with trauma lack nuance, leaving their experiences feeling flat. The attempt to blend historical figures with personal stories often feels forced and distracts from the core themes. Despite Anne Michaels talent for evocative language the novel ultimately falls short.

Was this review helpful?

Held by Ann Michaels is often quite stunning. Ranging in time from 1910 and 2025 it begins with a young soldier laying immobile on a WW1 French battlefield thinking of his loved ones and wondering if he'll ever see them again. The chapters telling of him and his wife,from meeting to after a war that he never really left behind are beautifully written and there's a touch of the supernatural ,which usually turns me off of any story instantly, that is moving and thought-provoking.

The rest of the book jumps around the generations of the couple's family and can be quite confusing,not least in the last few chapters that beat my efforts to link to the rest of the book completely.

The writing is amazing,often verging on beautiful,and I did enjoy it and appreciate it but it totally lost me towards the end when I was just left confused wondering what I'd missed,going back a couple of chapters and reading again I still didn't get it.

3 Stars for the book,without the confusing ending it would have been 4,and a solid 5 for the amazing writing, so overall 4.

Was this review helpful?

‘Held’ by Anne Micheals,makes for an interesting though at times challenging read.Just when one is comfortable with the direction of the storyline it ether stops abruptly or takes a different direction.Overall I enjoyed this book yet felt that some episodes would have benefited from following further through in their telling.The almost poetically worded styling was beautifully done though occasionally the threads of narrative unravelled a little in my opinion,diminishing the general effect.
Frequently an entrancing journey like recalling remnants of a half remembered dream.Worth making the effort to appreciate the delightful journey.

Was this review helpful?

NO SPOILERS:
Held begins in 1917, and moves back and forth between 1910 and 2025, with many stops in between. Each chapter fills a gap in the plot and completes the story.

But this is book is so much more than that. It is wisdom, reflection, meditation. It is words to savour and ponder, so very beautifully written awash with sentences and paragraphs which are a joy to read and re-read.

This passage is just beautiful:
“There are so many ways the dead show us they are with us. Sometimes they stay deliberately absent, in order to prove themselves by returning. Sometimes they stay close and then leave in order to prove they were with us. Sometimes they bring a stag to a graveyard, a cardinal to a fence, a song on the wireless as soon as you turn it on. Sometimes they bring a snowfall.”

And this, on dementia:
“He was lonelier than me, he didn’t even have himself.”

And this, on loss:
“When someone dies, the very air changes”

The thoughts and understanding of the characters (of course, these are really of the writer) show great understanding of compassion, being human, being alive and being absent.

For all that, I do have one criticism. Marie Curie, unless I am missing something, adds nothing to the book and it would be no less of a wonder without her.

At the time of writing, Held by Anne Michaels is on the Long List for the Booker Prize 2024.

Was this review helpful?

Held is a short novel currently longlisted for the 2024 Booker Prize. It was one of the few who spoke to me the most when it comes to the themes – it promised a reflective historical fiction that spans different generations and moments in time featuring a ghost and the tragedy of war.
I have to say I did not enjoy this book at all. The main issue I had with it was the overblown writing style. This was very much style over substance (I know the writer is also a poet and it shows). If you want to pick up this book I strongly encourage first reading a sample to see if the style works for you – clearly there are people who really enjoyed this novel but for me the writing was insufferable and the whole book was incredibly monotonous, pretentious and overall forgettable. It was trying very hard to be poignant and it really showed… There was almost no characterization, and I could not care for anything that happened in the disjointed narrative.

Thanks to Netgalley and Bloomsbury for the e-arc of this book in exchange for an honest review.

Was this review helpful?

Booker Prize longlisted.

Anne Michaels is a Canadian poet and novelist whose debut “Fugitive Pieces” won the Orange (now Women’s) Prize in only its second year (1997).

At the time of her second novel – The Winter Vault – she explained in a Guardian interview that while her poetry writing gace her the discipline of not wasting a single word, she started writing novels because "I was pushing the form as far as I could in the longer pieces, trying to make connections on a larger scale. I stretched the poetry as far as it would go … Fiction is expansive: it offers a way of layering things; of having images and gestures that connect between page 100 and page 303. It gives you the chance to bring the reader in slowly, via as many strands as you can”

This is her third novel and the first I have read – and I have to say that, even before reading this interview, my view reading it was that, both in terms of writing style and the impression I came away with, this had very much the experience of reading a linked poetry collection.

Ostensibly a series of vignettes – largely linked by four female generations of a family – and moving in time from 1910 to 2025 and in location from France to Suffolk to Estonia – it is thematically I think drawn together by two linked ideas (one timely but perhaps conventional, the other more unusual and I have to say slightly jarring for me initially).

We open in 1917 – John (the close point of view character in this section) lies wounded on a WWI battlefield in France facing another younger soldier. As John realises he is going to survive we realise the other soldier is dead, and we are also with John as memories from his life return, particularly the way in which he met his wife Helen.

Also though the key themes of the book emerge almost immediately:

Firstly (conventionally) war and its aftermath and how major world events play out in individual lives

Secondly (less conventionally and in my words) the interplay of science and mystery – the way in which both were going through a major point of development in the first decades of the twentieth century (science due to the discoveries of atomic science, radiation, relativity and so on; mystery due to the sudden uptake in spiritualism due to the sheer number of deaths of loved husbands and sons).

But all written in poetic language

The second section starts off again in conventional territory – John and Helena are living in North Yorkshire in 1920, John running a photographer’s studio remembering also the death of his mother in a Zeppelin raid and also remembering how Helena tried to persuade him to elope with her rather than enlisting. When however John takes a photo of a young man he is shocked to see an apparent image of another figure on the plate, even more so when the man reveals it is his mother - and that leads back in particular to the second theme above, in a nuanced and moving way.

From there the book becomes more fragmentary:

We meet Anna – John and Helen’s daughter – who travels over the world nursing in war zones; her hatmaker husband Peter and their daughter Mara who, despite the challenges on her own childhood from her mother’s frequent humanitarian absences, becomes herself a war-zone nurse and marries Alan, a war journalist, the two meeting after a bombing raid.

But we also see Marie Curie first by observation (by a female British mathematician writing to her now dead husband) including a vignette of a real life incident when with Pierre and a group of other scientists they attempt to measure and investigate what is happening a medium summons spirits; later in 1912 in the aftermath of the controversy over her second Nobel Prize when she flees to England to take refuge with her friend and fellow-widow Hertha Ayrton and both meditate on life and death (while also meeting the mathematician’s husband).

And two more enigmatic chapters are I believe based on the real life Estonian composer Arvo Pärt (fictionalised as Paavo) and the turn of the 20th Century French documentary photographer Eugène Atget (unnamed in the book).

And we finish with (I think) Mara’s daughter Anna observed by Aimo (a character we met in a previous chapter as a child) in what seems to be a new Baltic War in the very near future.

Overall this is a beautifully written book - one which rewards a re-read and which shows the truth of something John once wrote down

"The elusiveness of the form is the form"

Was this review helpful?

Held is a standout on this year’s Booker long-list, showcases the poetic brilliance of its author, a former poet whose lyrical style enhances the narrative. The novel, structured like a flowing river, navigates through a series of vignettes spanning from 1908 to 2025, exploring themes of love, loss, and memory against a backdrop of historical and personal upheavals.

Beginning on a World War I battlefield, the narrative delves into the persistence of love and its transcendence beyond death. Michaels’ prose is rich and evocative, though the book’s non-linear structure and fragmented style may challenge readers seeking a more traditional narrative.

The audiobook, which is narrated by the author adds a personal touch, though the depth of the prose is often best appreciated in print. It was so worthy I used an Audible credit.

Some of the book flows very well whereas some appears to be rushed and trying to tie it all together. This is a first for me by the author and one I enjoyed and I would read more of their work. The book cover is eye-catching and appealing and would spark my interest if in a bookshop. Thank you to the author, publisher and Netgalley for this ARC.

3.5/5.

Was this review helpful?

Longlisted for the 2024 Booker Prize

I have never read Anne Michaels before, and this was a revelation, profoundly thought provoking, pure poetry, as it intertwines the human, the intensely personal and intimate, and memory, with the bigger stage, the macro level, turbulence in the world, events, people, epic in its coverage of more than a century. The language is exquisite, but this is a work, despite its short length, that demands patience, and like me, I can imagine readers needing to return, to reread, to see and endeavour to understand more. The narrative is non-linear, vignettes, seemingly chaotic, spanning generations of a family, exploring fundamental themes and issues, of life and beyond, the soul, love, loss, grief, faith, and science.

Spanning 4 generations, in 1917 we have a soldier, John, in battlefield France, reflecting, the serendipity of his meeting Helena, but was there more to it? He survives to return to Yorkshire, not the same man, working as a photographer, wondering is that a ghost that he sees? If so, who is it? Eloquent, emotionally affecting, we move through time, devastation, countries, different places, encountering lovers, spiritualism, the tragedies, challenges, relationships, and the mysteries of life, to what do we give credence? Marie Curie, the Nobel prize winner escapes to England in this remarkable blend of fact and fiction.

This definitely deserves to be on the Booker longlist, which I hope brings it to the wider audience that it clearly deserves. A philosophical, disquieting, heartbreaking, yet ultimately hopeful treasure of a read that I highly recommend, this is not a book that you will forget in a hurry, and which you are likely to revisit again and again. Many thanks to the publisher for an ARC.

Was this review helpful?

'Held' is a beautifully written novel which explores love, longing and loss. The structure of the novel is quite fragmented and we meet a variety of characters at different moments across the course of more than a century. The novel begins with John, a soldier in WW1 who traces various memories as he lies wounded in France. We meet John again in 1920 in Yorkshire where he is now living with his wife, Helena, as he opens a photography studio but is still haunted by ghosts from the past. We then follow John and Helena's family through the twentieth century as well as looping back to before the war.

Every sentence Anne Michaels writes is exquisitely crafted, and contain some stunningly profound observations. I was particularly drawn to Alan, a war correspondent, who would "take his tipper lorry of language and empty the horror in plain view, so no one could claim they had not known", and his partner Mara, a field hospital nurse who becomes infuriated at "the obscenity of shops, aisles of abundance like temple offerings for the gods; at her colleagues' impassioned debates about the merits of certain restaurants as if they were moral questions" and struggles to adjust to "the absence of bombardment." There many other similarly powerful moments throughout this novel.

At times it is more difficult to trace the connections between characters and situations, especially in the second half of the novel, as so much is left unsaid, but this is undoubtedly a novel which will reward multiple attentive re-readings. Many thanks to NetGalley and the publisher for sending me an ARC to review.

Was this review helpful?

I really wanted to love this one and initially I did. The writing was gorgeous, I can’t deny that. However, I really struggled with the constant time jumps. It was hard to feel connected to John when I couldn’t figure out what timeline we were in, or what was real or a dream. There was mystery and intrigue and passion clearly present in the book, but the method of delivery felt confusing and jarring.

Was this review helpful?

I read the first part of this book the wrong way: 5 minutes here, 10 minutes there. But it demands quiet, patience, attention and room for contemplation. Once I started giving that, it worked - most of the time.

It is a contemplative, poetic work with loosely connected stories from the early 20th century to the present day about all those feelings that are under the surface. Desire especially, in all its forms, but also loss and grief, longing and memories.

One has to be in the mood and willing to go along. Sometimes I was and it was beautiful, sometimes I wasn't and got annoyed.

3,5

Was this review helpful?

'Who can say what happens when we are remembered?'

In the late 90s Fugitive Pieces astounded readers with its powerful tales of Jakob and Ben and deservedly gained international acclaim.

Held by Anne Michaels is another book that links lives ; this time across decades, continents, wars, trauma, families and love - from the early 20th century up to 2025.

Poetic, haunting, incredibly-thought provoking and at times needing multiple reads to truly determine what is being said.

Each individual story challenges our thoughts on the concept of being- a metaphysical trail emerges -the supernatural, the sense of the soul and awareness of people absent and no longer alive. The prose is beautiful - many sentences feel they need deeper discussion with friends and family

'The sense of a presence grew almost overpowering. Then, suddenly, the place was destitute. The presence was gone, though nothing outward had changed'
" I think we remember someone by living. I think that's the way to remember.'

This is a rewarding read and will trigger personal reflection - a meditation in being. This is by no means an easy read- it's non-linear structure needs focus but the depth of character created in limited prose is powerful.

Booker long-listed and deservedly so.

Challenging, hypnotic and captivating.

'There is only one language for each pair of souls. Others eavesdrop but do not understand.'

Was this review helpful?

<I><blockquote>That he is safe in her arms, loved by her forever, nothing can end this love she holds him in, love without end.</I></blockquote>

This is gorgeously elusive and yet manifest as, in prose with an internal beat and rhythm, Michaels conjures up a spiritual vision of life that is bound by love without a trace of sentimentality.

Moving through time and space from an injured soldier in a WW1 battlefield to Finland in 2025, this creates a kind of chain of love as characters live through grief, loss, memories and desire.

The image at the heart of this piece is that of being held in care, whether by human love, a kind of spiritual universe or the material memories of ghosts of parents and lovers.

This feels like a very careful piece that has probably been worked on extensively to pare back the extraneous and cut to the core of Michaels' vision. It is consoling and nurturing in tone, spiritual without the limitations of any doctrinal religion.

It's not a book to read when distracted, like while commuting: this invites - and deserves - concentration and quiet, time to embed yourself within the almost hypnotic, meditative rhythm of the prose.

The thing that didn't work for me is the fracturing of the bond between reader and characters: I felt involved with John and Helena in the first two sections and that personal absorption seems to be deliberately diluted to the spiritual aesthetics of the text. I can understand that but it did leave me floundering a bit as I never came to care so much again.

Nevertheless, a quiet book whose profundity comes from the peace it creates.

Was this review helpful?