O'Sullivan did a great job of summarizing an issue that's been on my mind for a very long time. However, I didn't come to this book with my mind made up; far from it. I have a lot of mixed and contradictory feelings about the modern push for diagnosis.

For full disclosure, I was diagnosed with autism as an adult and I'm not unlike some of the individuals O'Sullivan describes-- for me, it was wonderful to feel I understood the social and behavioural issues I'd had all my life. Up until that point, I felt that I was just not very good at being a human and considered it a failure on my part, so to have an answer to why I was that way was incredibly powerful. But, let's be real, I passed for neurotypical for close to thirty years. I don't have particularly high support needs. Years ago, I would have lived my life as someone socially-awkward and described merely as "eccentric." How helpful, really, is the diagnosis of people like me when focus on us takes essential care away from those whose autism results in severe disabilities?

I'm also really glad the author touched upon just how easy it is to buy a diagnosis through private healthcare. I've seen it happen with friends and family members. If you're willing to spend the money, it is astonishingly easy to get a diagnosis or a prescription. An acquaintance of mine once told me how they had lied about being depressed to get medication because it would help her sleep!

O'Sullivan makes a lot of important points and what shines through most of all is that she genuinely seems to care for her patients and the people receiving inadequate care because of our tendency to over-diagnose.

I'm a lecturer in public health and I've recently attended a lecture series on overdiagnosis of autism and ADHD, so I was naturally interested in reading this book. It's my first book of Suzanne's, and I'll be seeking out her previous ones on the strength of it! Each chapter was thought-provoking (and provocative, but backed up by solid research), and I liked the mix of evidence-based discussion (including the referencing of Cochrane reviews) and patient stories. There's also lots of examples that I'd love to reuse (with attribution) in lectures, for example the misconceptions around understandings of men's risk of prostate cancer, and the (sometimes) damage done by celebrity disclosures of a certain condition that drive up screening when screening may not be needed, or may not be the best use of limited resources. I learned something from each section, but the chapters on cancer and genetics testing and on neurodivergence were my most-highlighted. This would be a really good focus read for a non-fiction or health-related book group.

I was already familiar with O’Sullivan’s excellent work prior to picking up this book.
If anything, I am often on the opposite camp when it comes to medicine, but I like to challenge my opinions and learn more, and this was a great book for that.
As for the other aspects, I always find that O’Sullivan’s heart is in the right place. ‘What has happened to you?’ Not, ‘what’s wrong with you?’
Though, the biological maker-research also does not deal with what’s wrong with someone - I understand the author’s point, but I find it oversimplified at times.
The chapter about ADHD, neurodiversity and depression - I am curious to know what those who are the most qualified will have to say about that.
I respect and agree with the focus on sociological, psychological and personal circumstances and wider understanding of change. I wish this book were more balanced though.
As someone who has many neurodiverse family members and works with those with ASD and ADHD, I hope science can enlighten whys, hows but mostly how life can improve for everyone. The author wishes the same, however seems to have made up her mind on the reasons for (or the lack thereof) some conditions.

Thanks to NetGalley and the publisher for the e-ARC. This was a well written and fasicnating book about the way diagnosis has changed and what that means for our health.

This was a thoughtful and interesting look into the current medical world and the changes in the way people are diagnosed and medicalised.

O'Sullivan is balanced in her interviews and opinions and takes care to never actually come down on one side of the debate or the other and her look into the ethics of genetic testing were fascinating.

From experience I know that actually getting a diagnosis for a health condition does relieve some of the pressures in daily life but it is also a label that you do have to live with.

The Age of Diagnosis discusses many conditions such as Huntington’s disease, Lyme disease, long Covid, cancer, autism and ADHD. The question of diagnosis is considered throughout with the idea that a diagnosis can be negative. Healthy people are turned into patients through genetic testing and diagnosis. Ultimately, a diagnosis changes over time to envelop more people and include more symptoms. This can be both negative and positive as seen by Autism with low and high functioning autistic people.

This was really good and I had a great time reading it. It opened my mind to things I hadn’t considered before and made me question things. My favourite parts were the discussion on autism, ADHD and Lyme disease. I personally do think we are going too far with medicine in science and this book illustrates that. For example, people who think they have Lyme disease but have never encountered the ticks or bacteria that leads to the disease. Plus this talked about the issue of paying for a diagnosis through private healthcare. I really agreed with the autism section on how the diagnosis has expanded so much to include high functioning people and people who cannot function on their own. This was really good and I think it’s an important read.